Dear School
Community:
RIDE
developed this binder of draft
guidance documents to help you
understand your responsibilities and
options for responding to NCLB
sanctions. This document collection
provides accountability checklists,
communication and response tools,
and state reporting formats that
will enable you to fulfill both
district and school responsibilities
mandated under No Child Left Behind.
Watch Schools
(Binder
Resources)
“Watch Schools” are schools that
have not met adequate yearly
progress (AYP) measures and have
been identified as such in the most
recent school classifications by the
Rhode Island Department of
Education. While there are no
sanctions or interventions specified
under Title I for such schools, the
RIDE encourages schools and school
districts to become more pro-active
by using the principles and
practices associated with the
literature on school improvement.
Year 1: Choice
(Binder Resources)
Title I schools that have not met
AYP measures for two consecutive
years are in school improvement
status for the first year and must
offer transfer choices to all
parents of children enrolled in such
schools. The offer must be made
prior to the start of the new school
year. Parents are to be provided
the names of each public school and
charter school to which their
child(ren) may transfer, including
academic achievement information, A
district must provide or provide for
technical assistance to the school
and the school is required to
revise/revisit its school
improvement plan, with a peer review
of the plan occurring within
timelines outlined in the NCLB.
Year 2: Supplemental Educational
Services (SES)
(Binder
Resources)
Title I schools that have not met
AYP measures for three consecutive
years are in school improvement
status for the second year and must
offer supplemental educational
services to enrolled students from
low-income families for extra
academic assistance outside of the
school day. Schools must continue to
offer this assistance from the
State-approved provider list until
the schools are no longer identified
for improvement. All requirements
of Year 1 are to continue.
Year 3: Corrective Action
(Binder Resources)
Title I schools that have not met
AYP measures for four consecutive
years are in school improvement
status for the third year and must
continue to implement provisions of
Years 1 and 2. Corrective action (at
least one of seven required by NCLB)
by the district represents
intentions to take greater control
of the school’s management and to
have a greater role in school
decision-making. The corrective
action intervention by the district
is designed to increase in a
substantial way the likelihood that
all students will reach or exceed
state proficiency standards which
has not occurred over the last four
consecutive years.
Year 4: Restructuring
(Binder Resources)
Title I schools that have not met
AYP measures for five consecutive
years are in school improvement
status for the fourth year (Year 4)
and must continue to implement
provisions of Years 1-3. School
restructuring is a two-step
process. Generally speaking, the
LEA has one school year to prepare a
restructuring plan and to arrange to
implement it. The second step of the
process is the implementation of the
restructuring plan which generally
takes place in the ensuing year.
Restructuring requires that the
school district make an extensive
intervention in the functioning of
such schools and major changes in
the school’s operation by preparing
plan to implement an alternative
governance system for the school.
Year
5 and Beyond: Restructuring
(Binder Resources)
Title I schools that have not met
AYP measures for five consecutive
years are in school improvement
status for the fourth year (Year 4)
and must continue to implement
provisions of Years 1-3. School
restructuring is a two-step
process. Generally speaking, the
LEA has one school year to prepare a
restructuring plan and to arrange to
implement it. The second step of the
process is the implementation of the
restructuring plan which generally
takes place in the ensuing year.
Restructuring requires that the
school district make an extensive
intervention in the functioning of
such schools and major changes in
the school’s operation by preparing
plan to implement an alternative
governance