February 13, 2001
A meeting of the Board of Regents for Elementary and
Secondary Education was held at the Shepard Building, 255 Westminster Street, Providence,
RI 02903 and convened at 5:00 p.m. in room 501.
Present:
Chairman DiPrete, Mr. Canavan, Mr. Mancieri, Ms. Duff, and Ms.
Callahan.
Review and Discussion of Rhode Island High School
Summit Report
Deputy Commissioner Todd Flaherty gave the group an
historical review of the Summit and follow-up report, including the
work of the internal planning group, the pre-summit meetings, and the
work and recommendations from the Summit participants. Dr.
Flaherty then reviewed working documents.
Dr. Dennis Check described, in detail, the eight major areas for
transforming Rhode Island high schools as recommended:
| I.
Students Ready to Learn |
V. High
Schools Must be Adolescent Friendly, Yet Challenging |
| II. Basic
Literacy Must be a Priority |
VI. High
Schools Must Develop Cohorts of Leaders |
| III.
Students Must Learn What Matters. |
VII. High
Schools Must Teach for Tomorrow. |
| IV.
Communities Must Support High Schools and their Students |
VIII.
High Schools Help Students Embrace Learning as the Business of
Life |
(A complete description of the eight areas is
attached).
The report has incorporated all of the suggested
changes received thus far and will be distributed to Summit
participants for review.
Chairman DiPrete suggested a Regent sub-committee be
appointed that would review the recommendations and develop a plan for
re-structuring high schools that "makes sense."
The group then discussed issues related to high school graduation
requirements; if there is a statewide consensus for change, i.e. do
educators, parents, business, etc. really want to change and will
support change.
Regent Callahan expressed her support of the recommendations outlined
in the report emphasizing that local schools and districts are
indicating that they recognize that change is needed. However,
Ms. Callahan also emphasized to Board members that schools need a
guide on how to change; that the Regents will need to "paint them
a picture" of what to change and how to do it.
Representative Crowley talked to the group about the importance of
"schools leaders" and schools needing to have high
expectations, especially in the areas of reading and writing. He
urged the Board to be prescriptive about what is expected to be done
to improve schools.
Deputy Commissioner Flaherty talked about creating
opportunities to improve schools using the NEASC visit system.
Regent Callahan supported the concept of a network strategy to
help schools be better informed and to move forward. She also
supported mandatory recommendations that are "a must."
Regents expressed their concern that there is a lack
of community support to fund the re-structuring of high schools per
the recommendations.
Chairman DiPrete told members that if any Regents are
interested in serving on the High School Summit Review Committee to
see Bob Canavan at the end of the meeting.
Public Comments:
Joe DiMartino from Brown University stated his support
of the report and requested that the section on personal learning
plans be made stronger. He also asked about possible legislation and a
proposed timeline.
Additionally, Kathy Crowley from Mt. Pleasant High
School added her support to the Summit recommendations
Waiting" for this report with baited breath - looking forward
to keeping the momentum going forward; along with John Golden from the
Center for School Leadership urged the Regents to consider issues
related to time and scheduling. He also talked about
accountability issues in that principals are responsible for what goes
on in the building, but have little or no control over who comes into
the building to work.
Doreen Corrente, formerly of the Woonsocket Career and
Technical School, told members that the report and recommendations are
part of an ongoing conversation (about education). She focused on the
need for high school re-structuring and that the Regents need to set a
clear direction for change.
Ed Lamoi of Cranston High School West spoke to the
group about the need for local districts/schools to go in the same
direction and to work to garner public support for the
recommendations. He also urged the Regents, Commissioner, and
the Department of Education to play a role when a high school fails a
NEASC Evaluation.
The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m.