Rhode Island English Language Arts
Frameworks
Click below to download the complete
document in PDF Format:
Literacy
for ALL Students: The Rhode Island
English Language Arts Framework
The Rhode Island English Language Arts Frameworks
Introduction:

Educational Expectations in a Democratic Society
The National Education Reform Initiative
Education Reform in Rhode Island
Educational Expectations in a Democratic
Society
As we move into the 21st century, the well-being of
the people of Rhode Island depends more than ever on their level of educational
attainment. The challenges of living in a technologically advanced and democratic society
demand that all of us possess the knowledge and skills needed to support ourselves, our
families, our communities and our state. Indeed, as the nations of our world become
increasingly interdependent, the knowledge and skills with which we once managed our
affairs will no longer suffice. It is not enough for only a portion of our populace to
excel academically. Meeting the challenges of the next century will mean mobilizing the
talents and energy of all Rhode Islanders.
Not only does our future prosperity require a
universally well-educated populace, but our democratic values demand that all citizens be
given the same chance to realize their full potential. The time has come to reaffirm our
nation's promise of equal educational opportunity. We must commit ourselves fully to the
principle that all children can learn and have something meaningful to contribute to
society.
A crucial step in making this ideal a reality is the
establishment of high expectations for all students. As John Dewey once wrote, "What
the best and wisest parent wants for his own child, that must the community want for all
of its children." With appropriate support, every child can achieve at high levels.
High levels of achievement imply a commitment to
excellence in education for all students. We must be aware that students with severely
challenging conditions should have opportunities to achieve success at their personally
highest levels possible. We should not lower standards in advance for those students, but
rather provide them with access, support, and encouragement.
We must never lose faith in our democratic vision or
dismiss any child or group of children because they have not yet lived up to our
aspirations for them. To do so would be to betray the very democratic ideals that we
declare ourselves to hold. By setting high expectations for all students, we affirm our
commitment to democracy.
| The National Education Reform Initiative |
|
The present document is but one piece of a
larger, national education reform movement, the origins of which can be traced to the
publication in 1983 of "A Nation At Risk," a federal report calling for renewed
national commitment to educational excellence. Commissioned by the Reagan administration,
it called on families, teachers, and schools to set higher standards for student
achievement.
"A Nation At Risk" focused national
attention on the need for reform, but progress was slow. Disappointed with the rate of
change, the National Governors Association and the Bush administration collaborated in
1991 to formulate a set of six national education goals to be achieved by the year 2000.
Among these goals were that American students achieve "demonstrated competency in
challenging subject matter" and that "all students learn to use their
minds."
The national education goals culminated in the
passage of the Goals 2000: Educate America Act in 1994, a bipartisan effort led by
the Clinton administration. In addition to increasing the number of national education
goals from six to eight, it calls on states to construct broad-based teams to formulate
and adopt "world-class" standards and performance assessments for all students.
The new legislation guarantees that 95% of Goals 2000 funding to states will go directly
to schools and local districts, on a competitive basis, to help them achieve the new
standards.
| Education Reform in Rhode Island
|
|
As did many other states, Rhode Island
already had its own education reform initiative underway when Goals 2000 became law.
Formed by Governor Sundlun in 1991 to draft a plan for Rhode Island's educational renewal,
the 21st Century Commission published "Educating ALL Our Children" in 1992.
Among its many recommendations was that educators, families, business leaders, and
community members should collaboratively develop challenging student performance standards
appropriate to the 21st century.
Acting on both this recommendation and Goals 2000,
the Rhode Island Department of Education distributed an education survey to the people of
Rhode Island in June of 1994. It asked the following question: "What should all
young adults in Rhode Island know and be able to do to meet the responsibilities and
challenges of the 21st century?" People's responses fell into four broad
categories -- communication, problem solving, a common body of knowledge, and
responsibility -- which form the basis of Rhode Island's Common Core of Learning.
These categories reflect the basic competencies all students should achieve at all grade
levels and in all subject areas. (A copy of this report is included in the appendix of
this framework.)
The content area frameworks, of which the present
document is one, describe how the competencies outlined in the Common Core manifest
themselves in particular areas of the curriculum. They offer a map of how subject matter
and instruction can be organized to achieve these competencies across the content areas
and at various performance levels.
A key concept is that the four categories of the
Common Core permeate every facet of the curriculum from kindergarten through high school.
Students' communication skills, for example, are the concern of the mathematics, science
and health teacher, not just the teacher of English language arts. Art and physical
education teach problem solving to kindergartners as well as high school seniors. The
common body of knowledge shared by all literate Americans is transmitted in first grade
music as well as the advanced placement history class. And the whole range of educational
influences that children and young adults encounter in their formative years should teach
responsibility.
The Common Core of Learning, the frameworks, and the larger reform initiative of
which they are a part constitute a significant departure from past reform efforts in Rhode
Island. In the early 1980s the Basic Education Program (BEP) established certain baseline
input standards (such as health and safety requirements) deemed necessary for all children
to achieve minimally acceptable levels of academic competence. The Common Core
and frameworks endorse these standards as minimum requirements but aim much higher in
establishing challenging performance standards for all students. All students will be
expected not only to acquire knowledge but also to demonstrate their ability to access,
evaluate, and use it responsibly in a variety of contexts. Along with these new standards
comes the recognition that high expectations require state-of-the-art curriculum,
instruction and assessment, combining established practice with recent innovations, as
well as a commitment to helping all students achieve their full potential.